Both programs allow a trial period ( Adobe/ Final Cut), so if you have a Mac, give ’em both a shot. It will become pretty apparent to you which one is a better fit for your workflow. The only way you can really get to know both programs is actually editing a project in both. Are you a seasoned editor who wants a traditional NLE with the backing power of the Adobe Suite? Then Premiere is a solid bet. Are you a new editor who prefers a simple layout that can perform pro functions without too much hassle? Then Final Cut may be your choice. So obviously, this is going to come down to personal preference when deciding between the two. Let’s go into what the current iteration of Final Cut has to offer you, as well as its drawbacks. Over the past decade, Apple put in a lot of work to try and grab back their corner of the market share. They released Final Cut X, which at the time cut out a lot of the features and recognizable UX that Final Cut 7 offered in the name of “innovation.” This angered a lot of editors, who suddenly and loudly moved over to Premiere to do their editing. But, in 2011, Apple execs made a bold choice. When I started out in my editing career way back in 2008, I first learned non-linear editing through Final Cut 7. It was even used as the chosen NLE for the Coen Brother’s production of True Grit. When Final Cut 7 was released in 2007 to compete with Avid Media Composer, it quickly became the indie darling NLE.
Let’s dive in!įinal Cut has been either sitting comfortably on the top of the industry standard or slumped down in the lower rungs for the past two decades. Today, we are going to take a dive into each program, what strengths they have to offer, as well as the weaknesses they present. While the market share has lost its majority to NLE’s such as DaVinci Resolve and the industry titan Avid Media Composer, the overwhelming choice for your common editor will boil down to Adobe Premiere and Final Cut.īut who is right? Who is wrong? Well, as with all choices, it matters on what you use it for. The top market share position has ebbed and flowed between both programs due to updates on both sides of the aisle, and frequent shifts in what editors prefer at the time. It’s been the subject of heated bar debates and post-production meetups since the advent of the two programs - Final Cut or Premiere? Both Mac-heads and die-hard Adobe fans have battled it out for the better part of two decades with this argument. Lifetime licence for $299.99 (available on iTunes).Final Cut and Premiere Pro have been battling for the top spot in editors’ hearts for the past decade. However, there are many tutorials available on YouTube to help you learn your way around Final Cut Pro and within no time you will be a video editor expert! The number of features available with Final Cut Pro X may discourage an average user because of their difficulty levels. Major media houses including Disney use Final Cut Pro X for the production of most of their commercials! You can even create 3D titles using Final Cut Pro X. Final Cut Pro is from the Apply Family of softwares and hence it can be relied upon for the highest quality and efficiency.įinal Cut Pro X offers the users over 200 various video cutting and splitting options that can help to make movies to a professionally sophisticated standard. It is more of a high-end of video editing tools available. It must be understood that Final Cut Pro X is not meant for the use by beginners.
Final cut pro video editor for mac for mac os x#
Our final entry in the top 5 video editor softwares for Mac OS X El Capitan is Final Cut Pro X.
0 kommentar(er)
